Don't send WHO if we haven't received a reply for the last one yet
authorManuel Nickschas <sputnick@quassel-irc.org>
Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:03:30 +0000 (17:03 +0100)
committerManuel Nickschas <sputnick@quassel-irc.org>
Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:03:30 +0000 (17:03 +0100)
commitdbef809f160236d05e93256d8309085225b8b928
tree97de35e0fd98830d8ad585857744cfcc370ac754
parenteb606f89b0f97cbcb69b87e0ae749a05cd473ff2
Don't send WHO if we haven't received a reply for the last one yet

Before, we would send WHO in regular intervals even if no reply came back yet.
I suspect this, together with network issues, could be the reason for SendQ Exceeded
and similar issues.
Note that if we miss an ENDWHO reply now somehow, we won't ever send WHO again. I hope
this cannot happen.
src/core/corenetwork.cpp
src/core/corenetwork.h